Ethereum Fungible Tokens Standard ERC1363, ERC223, ERC677
ERCs vs EIPs vs RSKIPs​
Ethereum Requests for Comment (ERCs), and Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs) refer to the same thing - they were originally called ERCs, and then subsequently renamed to EIPs. These are all focused on improvements to Ethereum.
Rootstock Improvement Proposals (RSKIPs) use a similar process to improve Rootstock.
A small subset of EIPs, albeit an extremely popular subset, are tokens standards, which have to do with smart contracts, and do not have much to do with the Ethereum nodes. Instead, they focus on the Solidity smart contract implementations with the intent to standardise the ways in which tokens get implemented.
Ethereum Token Standards work on Rootstock​
Since the Rootstock Virtual Machine (RSKVM) is compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) at the op-code level, smart contracts that are compiled to target the EVM can be executed in exactly the same way on the RSKVM.
Note: Some differences exist, most notably to do with how gas costs are calculated, both in terms of the schedule per op-code, as well as the calculation methodology. At the time of writing, like-for-like smart contract function invocations cost 2% to 2.5% on Rootstock compared to Ethereum.
Owing to this level of compatibility, the same smart contracts standards that work on Ethereum also work on Rootstock - there is no need to create "mirror RSKIPs" that are the equivalent of EIPs for token standards, since they will be virtually identical.
Fungible Tokens​
address -> amount
At their core, fungible tokens are smart contracts which store a mapping of addresses to amounts. This is used to represent an understanding that each particular address is the owner of a particular amount of tokens.
transfer(...)
These smart contracts will also have a transfer
function,
that allows them to transfer the tokens held in one address to another address.
Of course, there is a lot more to fungible tokens than the above, the above is merely a rudimentary illustration.